Hi J
The next release is now available from the usual location.
Regarding your query, using the string replace functoid will indeed work, but as you infer it’s possibly not the best way of doing things, especially if the list of values could change over time or potentially overlap. There are alternatives in the form of a database lookup functoid (although this then introduces potential portability issues and another point of failure), or a code lookup (a code functoid with a switch / case statement), or indeed a sequence of If functoids (again a little undesirable). My preferred solution would be to go for a Literal Xml functoid with an XPath lookup functoid – let me know if you want any help with this.
Many thanks,
Ben.
Ben Jackson
SmartsIntegrator Technical Support